St. Mark's Square looking out over the Adriatic, Venice, Italy

RSS 2.0 Combined
RSS 2.0 Main Postings Only
RSS 2.0 Comments Only

Blog Roll
Bitterpill
bopl
Captaint
Crinch
GaryKoelling
Gnitter
Iffy
JBlog
looneys.net
Mary Lebens
Philip Holland
The Squire
Steven Boyd
Underrosandafros

Archives
Oct 03 - Nov 03
Nov 03 - Dec 03
Dec 03 - Jan 04
Jan 04 - Feb 04
Feb 04 - Mar 04
Mar 04 - Apr 04
Apr 04 - May 04
May 04 - Jun 04
Jun 04 - Jul 04
Jul 04 - Aug 04
Aug 04 - Sep 04
Sep 04 - Oct 04
Oct 04 - Nov 04
Nov 04 - Dec 04
Dec 04 - Jan 05
Jan 05 - Feb 05
Feb 05 - Mar 05
Mar 05 - Apr 05
Apr 05 - May 05
May 05 - Jun 05
Jun 05 - Jul 05
Jul 05 - Aug 05
Aug 05 - Sep 05
Sep 05 - Oct 05
Oct 05 - Nov 05
Nov 05 - Dec 05
Dec 05 - Jan 06
Jan 06 - Feb 06
Feb 06 - Mar 06
Mar 06 - Apr 06
Apr 06 - May 06
May 06 - Jun 06
Jun 06 - Jul 06
Jul 06 - Aug 06
Aug 06 - Sep 06
Sep 06 - Oct 06
Oct 06 - Nov 06
Nov 06 - Dec 06
Dec 06 - Jan 07
Jan 07 - Feb 07
Feb 07 - Mar 07
Mar 07 - Apr 07
Apr 07 - May 07
May 07 - Jun 07
Jun 07 - Jul 07
Jul 07 - Aug 07
Aug 07 - Sep 07
Sep 07 - Oct 07
Oct 07 - Nov 07
Nov 07 - Dec 07
Dec 07 - Jan 08
Jan 08 - Feb 08
Feb 08 - Mar 08
Mar 08 - Apr 08
Apr 08 - May 08
May 08 - Jun 08
Jun 08 - Jul 08
Jul 08 - Aug 08
Aug 08 - Sep 08

Webstring Plus Django

I plan to do a small project using Django. This is here to remind me to use Webstring as the templating engine.

By: Colonel Nikolai

Fri Aug 15 17:15:12 CDT 2008
For General Release
Filed under: technology->software->internet->web->mvc->django
Permalink

Comment


McCain, be honest: We can't drill our way to lower gas prices

John McCain is trying to leverage uniformed anger at pump prices against Obama. Giving up on his "straight talk", he's blaming Obama's stance on offshore drilling as being a root cause of higher prices.

Reality check: The DOE says the total amount of proven reserves in the US offshore holdings represents approximately 8 months of world wide consumption. The DOE also reported that it will take two decades of drilling to have any effect on domestic oil prices. At the very least, it will take years before the first of it is available for refinement. Last I checked, offshore drilling on US coastal waters is not a government program, it is a for-profit venture. Therefore this oil will go onto the world market for sale, which is why its effect on domestic oil prices are so blunted. So there is little that government can do to lower gas prices that doesn't involve a subsidy, which would be crazy; subsidizing gas prices is what caused the massive spike in prices recently because there was no commensurate reduction in consumption.

It's time for all of us to realize that high prices are the only thing that reduces consumption. The Federal Highway Administration reported that in the first 5 months of 2008, Americans drove 30 billion fewer miles than they did during the same period the previous year. We should instead of considering a reduction in gas taxes, consider a gas floor tax: use taxes to keep the price of gas above 4 dollars a gallon even if it falls below that on the world market. Use the tax revenues gained for anything you want! Use it to balance the budget! Fund alternative energy! Use it to build stadiums! Shore up medicaid/social security! Use it to develop a better oatmeal cookie recipe, you pick! Whatever we can do to get people to stop driving less and make different choices, because price is the only thing that changes this behavior.

By: Colonel Nikolai

Sun Aug 10 11:43:45 CDT 2008
For General Release
Filed under: politics->peakoil
Permalink

Comment

Re: McCain, be honest: We can't drill our way to lower gas prices
Exactly. Except for the conclusion of anything other than a free market :). To quote the Economist, "The problem with U.S. energy prices is not the current high oil prices, but the historically low oil prices." Our subsidies have kept price too low and we've organized our infrastructure around an unsustainable and unjustifiably low price.
posted by: Hamlet , on Mon Aug 11 09:01:44 CDT 2008

Free market or "Free" market

So are you one of those Market Fundamentalists? (Meaning: the market has magical powers that can cure all of societies ills, ie, the market as a fetish).

posted by: Colonel Nikolai, on Mon Aug 11 12:26:10 CDT 2008

Re: Honest

I think we are long past the point where one can say "McCain, be honest" other than ironically.

In other news, I suspect we will be ready for gas at $7/gallon within 2 years, and nostalgic for it in 10 years.

posted by: BalRog , on Mon Aug 11 17:10:31 CDT 2008

Re: Re: Honest

Well, that would make my 4 dollar floor pointless, wouldn't it? I want to also say that the 30 billion miles we didn't drive this year so far is the first reduction in gas use in a generation which by any estimation is startling.

Wish Hamlet would come back and comment on my very leading question. Or maybe it was too flame-batey.

On the issue of "the ownership economy" and "free markets", the New Yorker recently published an awesome story of summing up what constitutes too much ownership, based on writings in the book The Gridlock Economy by Michael Heller. Good fodder for this discussion.

posted by: Colonel Nikolai, on Mon Aug 11 17:44:44 CDT 2008

Re: The $4 Floor
Colonel said:
Well, that would make my 4 dollar floor pointless, wouldn't it?

Well, that is not what I meant. And I certainly don't think a $4 floor would do us any harm. But the only reason prices are less than $4 now is that we are near the end of the systolic season of gas price pressure and starting the diastolic season. Of course, that also means that we will soon be entering the systolic season of natural gas and heating oil price pressure.

I want to also say that the 30 billion miles we didn't drive this year so far is the first reduction in gas use in a generation which by any estimation is startling.

That reduction is happening in a fairly healthy way in the major northern urban centers, but not so much in rural south and desert/wilderness west. There the reduction in usage is more like a white flag of surrender than like an orderly retreat, more like going to bed without supper than like pushing away from dessert, more like falling off of the unemployment rolls because you gave up than like falling off because you settled for less pay.

posted by: BalRog , on Mon Aug 11 18:10:35 CDT 2008


Overheard: Generation Gap

Son: So let me get this straight: when you were a kid in school they taught you that when there was a nuclear attack, that you had to get under your desk, right?
Dad: That's right, son.
Son: And this is the same place that taught you everything else you know?

By: Colonel Nikolai

Sat Aug 09 16:47:34 CDT 2008
For General Release
Filed under: culture->politics->genxversusboomer
Permalink

Comment

Re: Overheard: Generation Gap

I'm sort of a "late boomer", coming up in the '60s rather than the '50s. I don't know about you, but they never taught that in my schools, including my first elementary school in Hampton, VA.

Back in the '60s that school was within a 10 mile radius of AF Tactical Air Command HQ, Army Transport Command HQ, NATO HQ, Newport News Shipbuilding (the only place in the USA with dry docks big enough to construct nuclear carriers), 3 major naval bases, a Nike ABM site, and the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. So if ever there were schoolkids that needed to know how to use their desks to protect them from gamma rays, we were them.

Or maybe they figured that we didn't need to worry, since those Nikes were going to stop all the incoming nukes.

posted by: BalRog , on Mon Aug 11 17:42:06 CDT 2008

50's or 60's
Well, that begs the question: did they stop teaching the duck and cover in the 50's or 60's. I think the 50's, which your experience would support.
posted by: Colonel Nikolai, on Wed Aug 13 12:58:21 CDT 2008

Anecdotal evidence, exhibit C
Colonel said:
I think the 50's, which your experience would support.

My high school English teacher (in the 1978) once told us that back in the '50s the school required her to practice these stupid drills with her classes (supporting the hypothesis). She said that she became notorious for carefully reading the prepared statement, and then opining "If that isn't the biggest load of hooey I've ever heard in my life, I don't know what is."

posted by: BalRog , on Wed Aug 13 13:53:17 CDT 2008


Path back to health #1

So I'm in my third week of my program. I work out Monday Wednesday and Friday.

I'm able to do all of these on the same machine, with about 10-30 seconds to switch the machine around or attach a different cabling system (the BF Sport has two: one of the overhead bar, one for the leg extension; either one attaches to the main cable, which is what you use for most of the common upper body exercises) for a different exercise. The entire routine is done in 30 minutes and I can tell I've had a decent workout (my muscles feel laden, big and I've worked up a good sweat).

I added two more exercises this week: seated calf raise and shoulder shrug. The calf raise is kind of a joke: the machine doesn't have enough weight for me to get to MMF. Not sure about the shrug, either. Should I buy the 200 more pounds of power rods?

The results? I seem to have lost about 4 lbs. I'm not sure, but I seem to be stronger, too: the amount of weight I can handle in a given exercise has gone up between 10-50 lbs. I have also cut down coffee drinking to 1 cup per day. Not because I think I drink too much coffee, but it just didn't make me feel good having a second cup since I started working out, it's weird. I generally feel much better. It also seems to have had an emotional effect on me. I'm more even keeled. Things that used to really get me steamed now seem to just float by.

One other thing I noticed: I'm drinking a lot more water and eating sensible meals at sensible hours. I find if I stop eating and drinking by 7PM, I'm stronger in the morning for my workout and I feel much better throughout the day.

By: Colonel Nikolai

Wed Aug 06 17:42:15 CDT 2008
For General Release
Filed under: science->fitness
Permalink

Comment